|
課程名稱 |
審議民主理論與實踐專題
SEMINAR ON THEORY AND PRACTICE OF DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY |
|
開課學期 |
99-1 |
|
授課對象 |
社會科學院 社會學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
林國明 |
|
課號 |
Soc8014 |
|
課程識別碼 |
325 D1520 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期二6,7,8(13:20~16:20) |
|
上課地點 |
社110 |
|
備註 |
限博士班
總人數上限：10人
外系人數限制：5人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/991deliberation |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
審議民主不僅是當前民主理論一股重要的思潮，也在民主實踐場域逐漸蔚為嶄新的公民參與
模式。本課程的主要目的，在探索審議民主理論與實踐的互動關連。ㄧ方面，我們將探究
「所有具有正當性的法律與政策都應由所有平等的、自由的公民的經由公共說理的方式來產
生」這樣的規範性理念，如何轉化為制度性、程序性的，可以運作的民主實踐，又遇到什麼
阻礙？另一方面，我們要以強調公共討論的公民參與模式的實踐經驗，來檢視審議民主理論
的規範基礎和經驗假定。從理論與實踐的互動關連中，我們將探討：哪些條件，影響了體現
審議民主理念的公民參與實務的發展經驗。
|
|
課程目標 |
具體而言，本課程內容包括：
1. 審議民主在當前民主理論中的位置，它的基本理念，與其他民主理念的對照，以及倡導
它的理由，以及對它的批判；
2. 體現「審議民主精神」的公民參與模式的操作原則、實踐經驗與模式比較，尤其著重於
介紹和討論起源於美國的審議式民調、公民陪審團和學習圈，以及起源於歐洲的公民會
議和願景工作坊：
3. 公民如何審議？哪些因素促成公民能夠進行理性知情的討論？審議如何可能產生轉化的
效果？
4. 誰來審議？具有不同社會屬性與位置的公民是否有平等的機會可以參與審議？誰被排
除？參與審議者可以「代表」特定政治社群的公民整體嗎？「代表」的意義為何？誰的
觀點可以再現於審議過程與結果？
5. 在多元差異的社會中，公民審議是否可能，以及如何達成共識？共識是優勢觀點對少數
意見的壓制嗎？差異如何在「共識導向」的討論中被認可？
6. 重視論理的公民審議，是否壓抑情感的表達？公共討論是否可能「情理兼具」？公共說
理與修辭的關連為何？
7.社會運動、利益政治與審議民主的關係為何？強調衝突、策略行動和實力政治的社會運
動，與「溫良恭簡讓」的審議民主是否有內在緊張關係？審議民主如何在傳統的利益政
治過程中運作而影響決策？
8. 公民社會、公共領域與審議民主的關係為何？公民社會與國家的互動關係，以及政治體
系的制度特質和歷史脈絡，如何影響審議民主的發展經驗？
|
|
課程要求 |
修課要求及成績評量
1. 閱讀指定文獻，積極參與討論。 討論佔學期成績 20％。
2. 每週撰寫一頁的 memo 來討論閱讀文獻。Memo 佔學期成績 40％。
3. 針對本課程索討論的特定主題，撰寫一萬字的期末報告。題目須先經過我同意。 期
末報告佔學期成績 40％。
|
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
|
|
指定閱讀 |
各周進度與閱讀內容
第一週 9/14 課程介紹
第二週 9/21 什麼是審議民主？基本理念
Gutmann, Amy., and Dennis Thompson. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton University Press. Ch. 1. pp. 1-62
Bohamm, James., 1996, Introduction: Deliberation and Democracy. in Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. MIT Press. pp. 1-21.
第三週 9/28 審議民主理論的經驗研究現況
Thompson, Dennis. 2008. Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p497-520
Ryfe, David M. 2005. Does Deliberative Democracy Work? .Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p49-71,
Chambers, Simone. 2003. Deliberative Democracy Theory . Annual Review of Political Science, 2003, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p307-326, 20p
第四週 10/5 公共審議的特質
Bohamm, James., 1996, What Is Public Deliberation? in Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. MIT Press. pp. 23-68
Cohen, Joshua. 1997. Deliberation and Democracy Legitimacy. in James Bohman and William Rehg eds., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. MIT Press. pp. 67-91
第五週 10/12 審議式公民參與模式 I : 公民會議與歐洲模式
林國明、陳東升，2003 〈公民會議與審議民主：全民健保的公民參與經驗〉，《台灣社會學》，第六期：61-118
Edna F. Einsiedel, and Deborah L. Eastlick, 2000, Consensus Conference as Deliberative Democracy. Science Communication 21(4): 323-343
Penny Street, 1997. Scenario Workshops: A Participatory Approach to Sustainable Urban Living? Future Vol. 29. No. 2. pp. 139-158. 1997
Stef Steyaert , and Herve Lisoir, 2005, Participatory Methods Toolkit: A Practitioner’s Manual , King Baudouin Foundation. Pp. 69-88; 163-174
林國明，2008，審議民主公民參與全國型議題操作手冊，第二章「公民會議」，第三章「願景工作坊」，行政院研考會
第六週 10/19 審議式公民參與模式 II: 審議式民調與美國模式
Fishkin, James. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. Yale University Press. Ch. 5. Pp. 134-176
Graham Smith, and Corinne Wales, 2000, Citizens Juries and Deliberative Democracy, Political Studies 48:51-65
Stef Steyaert , and Herve Lisoir, 2005, Participatory Methods Toolkit: A Practitioner’s Manual , King Baudouin Foundation. Pp. 48-68; 87-108
林國明，2008，審議民主公民參與全國型議題操作手冊，第四章「公民陪審團」，第五章「審議式民調」，行政院研考會
第七週 公民審議的代表性
Urbinati1, Nadia., and Mark E. Warren. 2008. The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory, Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 11: 387-412
Brown, Mark B., 2006, Survey Article: Citizen Panels and the Concept of Representation. The Journal of Political Philosophy: Volume 14, Number 2, pp. 203–225
Dryzek, John. S. and Simon Ninemeyer. 2008. Discursive Representation, American Political Science Review, 102(4): 481-493
Young, Iris. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. ch. 4. University of Oxford Press. pp. 121-153. 10/26
第八週 11/2 審議的不平等
Bohamm, James., 1996, Deliberative Inequalities., in Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. MIT Press. pp. 107-149
Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy, in Justice Interruptus. Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge, pp. 69-98.
Karpowitz1, Christopher F.m Chad Raphael, and Allen S. Hammond. 2009. Deliberative Democracy and Inequality: Two Cheers for Enclave Deliberation among the Disempowered, Politics and Society, 37: 576-615
第九週 11/9 多元差異與溝通行動
Bachtiger, Andre et. al., 2010. Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities, The Journal of Political Philosophy: Volume 18, Number 1, 2010, pp. 32–63
Young, Iris. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. ch. 3. University of Oxford Press. pp. 81-120.
第十週 11/16 共識、權力與審議結果
Heyssea, Tim. 2006, Consensus and Power in Deliberative Democracy. Inquiry, Volume 49, Issue 3: 265-289
McBride, Cillian. 2003, Consensus, Legitimacy, and the Exercise of Judgement in Political Deliberation, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Volume 6, Issue 3 : 104 - 128
Gaus, Gerald., 1997, Reason, Justification and Consensus: Why Democracy Cannot Have it All. in James Bohman and William Rehg eds., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. MIT Press. pp. 205-242
第十一週 11/23 公共審議的理性、感性與修辭
Young, Iris. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. ch. 2. University of Oxford Press. pp. 52-80
Hickerson, Andrea. & John Gastil, 2008. Assessing the Difference Critique of Deliberation: Gender, Emotion, and the Jury Experience, Communication Theory 18: 281–303
Barnes, Marian. 2008. Passionate participation: Emotional experiences and expressions in deliberative forums, Critical Social Policy 2008; 28; 461-481
范雲, 2010, 說故事與民主討論 —一個公民社會內部族群對話論壇的分析, 《臺灣民主季刊》第七卷,第一期 (2010年3月):65-105
第十二週 11/30 公共領域、市民社會與審議民主
Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Civil Society and the Political Public Sphere. In Between Facts and Norms. Pp.327-387. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Young, Iris. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. ch. 2. University of Oxford Press. pp. 154-195
第十三週 12/7 審議民主與社會運動
Dryzek, John S. 2000. Difference Democracy: The Consciousness-Raising against the Gentlemen’s Club. In Deliberative Democracy and Beyond：Liberal, Critics, Contestations. Pp. 57-80.
Young, Iris. M. 2001. Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29, 5, 670- 690. York: Oxford University Press.
Levine, P. & Nierras, R.M. 2007. Activists’ views of deliberation. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3, 1, 1-14.
Hendriks, Carolyn M., John S. Dryzek Christian Hunold, 2007, Turning Up the Heat: Partisanship in Deliberative Innovation, Political Studies, VOL 55, 362–383
第十四週 12/14 審議民主與利益政治
Mansbridge, J. 2010. The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy: Volume 18, Number 1, pp. 64–100
Hendriks, Carolyn M. 2006, When the Forum Meets Interest Politics: Strategic Uses of Public Deliberation, Politics & Society. Vol. 34; 571-602
第十五週 12/21 個案討論：廢除死刑與性交易除罰化公民會議的比較
閱讀兩次公民會議的相關資料
第十六週 12/28 政治體制與審議民主的實踐：台灣與國際比較
林國明，2009，國家、公民社會與審議民主：公民會議在台灣的發展經驗，台灣社會學，第十七期，161-217
Dryzek, John S., and Aviezer Tucker, 2008, Deliberative Innovation to Different Effect: Consensus Conference in Denmark, France, and the United States. Public Administration Review.
Nielsen, Annika Porsborg., Jesper Lassen, and Peter Sandoe, 2007. Democracy At Its Best? The Consensus Conference in a Cross-National Perspective, Journal Of Agricultural And Environmental Ethics (2007) 20:13–35
第十七週 1/4 期末報告
|
|
參考書目 |
參考每週進度 |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
9/14 |
課程介紹
|
|
第2週 |
9/21 |
什麼是審議民主？基本理念 <br/><br/>
Gutmann,Amy.Dennis Thompson 2004, Why Deliberative Democracy. Princeton University pp. 1-62<br/>
Bohamm, James., 1996, Introduction: Deliberation and Democracy. in Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. MIT Press. pp. 1-21.
|
|
第3週 |
9/28 |
審議民主理論的經驗研究現況<br/><br/>
Thompson, Dennis. 2008. Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p497-520<br/>
Ryfe, David M. 2005. Does Deliberative Democracy Work? .Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p49-71,<br/>
Chambers, Simone. 2003. Deliberative Democracy Theory . Annual Review of Political Science, 2003, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p307-326, 20p |
|
第4週 |
10/05 |
公共審議的特質<br/><br/>
Bohamm, James., 1996, What Is Public Deliberation? in Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. MIT Press. pp. 23-68<br/>
Cohen, Joshua. 1997. Deliberation and Democracy Legitimacy. in James Bohman and William Rehg eds., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Po |
|
第5週 |
10/12 |
審議式公民參與模式 I : 公民會議與歐洲模式<br/><br/>
林國明、陳東升，2003 〈公民會議與審議民主：全民健保的公民參與經驗〉，《台灣社會學》，第六期：61-118 <br/>
Edna F. Einsiedel, and Deborah L. Eastlick, 2000, Consensus Conference as Deliberative Democracy. Science Communication 21(4): 323-343<br/>
Penny Street, 1997. Scenario Workshops: A Participatory Approach to Sustainable Urban Living? Future Vol. 29. No. 2. pp. 139-158. 1997<br/>
Stef Steyaert , and Herve Lisoir, 2005, Participatory Methods Toolkit: A Practitioner’s Manual , King Baudouin Foundation. Pp. 69-88; 163-174<br/>
林國明，2008，審議民主公民參與全國型議題操作手冊，第二章「公民會議」，第三章「願景工作坊」，行政院研考會
|
|
第6週 |
10/19 |
審議式公民參與模式 II: 審議式民調與美國模式<br/><br/>
Fishkin, James.1995. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. Yale University Press. Pp.; 134-176<br/>
Graham Smith, and Corinne Wales, 2000, Citizens Juries and Deliberative Democracy, Political Studies 48:51-65<br/>
Stef Steyaert , and Herve Lisoir, 2005, Participatory Methods Toolkit: A Practitioner’s Manual , King Baudouin Foundation. Pp. 48-68; 87-108<br/>
林國明，2008，審議民主公民參與全國型議題操作手冊，第四章「公民陪審團」，第五章「審議式民調」，行政院研考會
|
|
第7週 |
10/26 |
公民審議的代表性<br/><br/>
Urbinati1, Nadia., and Mark E. Warren. 2008. The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory, Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 11: 387-412 <br/>
Brown,‭ Mark B., 2006,‭ Survey Article: Citizen Panels and the Concept of Representation. The Journal of Political Philosophy: Volume 14, Number 2, pp. 203–225<br/>
Dryzek, John.; ; and Simon Ninemeyer. 2008. Discursive Representation, American Political Science Review,102(4):481-493<br/>
Young, Iris. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. ch. 4. University of Oxford Press. pp. 121-153. 10/26
|
|
第8週 |
11/02 |
審議的不平等<br/><br/>
Bohamm, James., 1996, Deliberative Inequalities., in Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. MIT Press. pp. 107-149<br/>
Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy, in Justice Interruptus. Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge, pp. 69-98.<br/>
Karpowitz1, Christopher F.m Chad Raphael, and Allen S. Hammond. 2009. Deliberative Democracy and Inequality: Two Cheers for Enclave Deliberation among the Disempowered, Politics and Society, 37: 576-615
|
|
第9週 |
11/09 |
多元差異與溝通行動<br/><br/>
Bachtiger, Andre et. al., 2010. Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities, The Journal of Political Philosophy: Volume 18, Number 1, 2010, pp. 32–63<br/>
Young, Iris. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. ch. 3. University of Oxford |
|
第10週 |
11/16 |
共識、權力與審議結果<br/><br/>
Heyssea, Tim. 2006, Consensus and Power in Deliberative Democracy. Inquiry, Volume 49, Issue 3: 265-289 <br/>
McBride, Cillian. 2003, Consensus, Legitimacy, and the Exercise of Judgement in Political Deliberation, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Volume 6, Issue 3 : 104 - 128<br/>
Gaus, Gerald., 1997, Reason, Justification and Consensus: Why Democracy Cannot Have it All. in James Bohman and William Rehg eds., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. MIT Press. pp. 205-242
|
|
第11週 |
11/23 |
公共審議的理性、感性與修辭<br/><br/>
Young, Iris. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. ch. 2. University of Oxford Press. pp. 52-80<br/>
Hickerson, Andrea. & John Gastil, ‭ 2008. Assessing the Difference Critique of Deliberation: Gender, Emotion, and the Jury Experience, Communication Theory 18:‭ 281–303<br/>
Barnes, Marian. 2008. Passionate participation: Emotional experiences and expressions in deliberative forums, Critical Social Policy 2008; 28; 461-481<br/>
范雲, 2010,‭ 說故事與民主討論 —一個公民社會內部族群對話論壇的分析, 《臺灣民主季刊》第七卷,第一期 (2010年3月):65-105
|
|
第12週 |
11/30 |
公共領域、市民社會與審議民主<br/><br/>
Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Civil Society and the Political Public Sphere. In Between Facts and Norms. Pp.327-387. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<br/>
Young, Iris. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. ch. 2. University of Oxford Press. pp. 154-195
|
|
第13週 |
12/07 |
審議民主與社會運動<br/><br/>
Dryzek, John S. 2000. Difference Democracy: The Consciousness-Raising against the Gentlemen’s Club. In Deliberative Democracy and Beyond：Liberal, Critics, Contestations. Pp. 57-80.<br/>
Young, Iris. M. 2001. Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29, 5, 670- 690. York: Oxford University Press. <br/>
Levine, P. & Nierras, R.M. 2007. Activists’ views of deliberation. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3, 1, 1-14.<br/>
Hendriks,Carolyn M., John S. Dryzek, and Christian Hunold, 2007, Turning Up the Heat: Partisanship in Deliberative Innovation, Political Studies,‭ VOL 55, 362-383 |
|
第14週 |
12/14 |
審議民主與利益政治<br/><br/>
Mansbridge, J. 2010. The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy: Volume 18, Number 1, pp. 64–100 <br/>
Hendriks, Carolyn M. 2006. When the Forum Meets Interest Politics: Strategic Uses of Public Deliberation, Politics & Society. Vol.34: 571-602
|
|
第15週 |
12/21 |
個案討論：廢除死刑與性交易除罰化公民會議的比較
閱讀兩次公民會議的相關資料
|
|
第16週 |
12/28 |
政治體制與審議民主的實踐：台灣與國際比較<br/><br/>
林國明，2009，國家、公民社會與審議民主：公民會議在台灣的發展經驗，台灣社會學，第十七期，161-217<br/>
Dryzek, John S., and Aviezer Tucker, 2008, Deliberative Innovation to Different Effect: Consensus Conference in Denmark, France, and the United States. Public Administration Review.<br/>
Nielsen, Annika Porsborg., Jesper Lassen, and Peter Sandoe, 2007. Democracy At Its Best? The Consensus Conference in a Cross-National Perspective, Journal Of Agricultural And Environmental Ethics (2007) 20:13–35
|
|
第17週 |
1/04 |
期末報告 |
|